Interesting exchange on Reddit

Here: Interesting exchange on Reddit

Small and oblique = extract from the petition
Large and oblique = comment
Normal text = my reply
As things stand, the future of Parliament’s second chamber (the Lords) is going to be decided by the first chamber (the Commons). It’s like the criminals deciding the make-up of the judiciary.
At the moment, the government decide the exact makeup of the House of Lords through appointments. They are proposing that they give up that right, and allow the public to choose the makeup through proportional representation.

It sounds great the way you put it.

But it will still be more of the same: here’s a bunch of party hacks, which would you like?

For many of us the answer is ‘neither’, we recognize that the second chamber must be different to be effective.

We, the people of the United Kingdom, demand our right to choose the future make-up of the House of Lords. We demand a referendum…
That’s what the governments proposals are — the public chooses. This petition is demanding the public vote on whether the public should be allowed vote on the makeup of the House of Lords. While we’re at it, why doesn’t the public vote on whether the public should be allowed vote on whether the public should be allowed vote on the makeup of the House of Lords?

Delightfully put. But you are misunderstanding.

The petition is demanding that the people get to consider a range of options including, but not limited to, popular elections.

Some people (who are neither MPs nor peers) think that the status quo is better than another elected house. Others favour a ‘house of experts’.
Both groups are being denied a say.

See this comment from a member of the public to a BBC article on the subject:

“Get the politicians OUT of the House of Lords. The whole point about it is that it is a different forum to the Commons. Only politicians could possibly think the answer to everything is more politicians!”
… and enough time and opportunity for a full popular debate.
The bill has been given a whole year for pre-legislative scrutiny…

Pre-legislative scrutiny by politicians of a proposal that is in the vested interests of politicians.

…That’s pretty much unheard of, you can’t really ask for more…

They’ve done more than usual so we should be happy. How gracious of them.

Don’t forget that this isn’t just some ordinary piece of proposed legislation.

How we make decisions is the most important decision we make.

We, and our children and grand-children, will have to live with the consequences, potentially for ever.

So we should ask for more. Indeed, we should demand the opportunity to vote for our ideas for the make-up of our parliament.

…The vested interests who want to retain the status quo will have plenty of time to pick apart the proposals and water them down.

You are happy that parliament decides what happens to the second chamber because you like the way it’s going.

How can a house of whipped, party politicians scrutinize the bills of a house of whipped, party politicians?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s